Volatility, Rigidity, Controversy: The Three Deadly Sins in Modern Football Management

Volatility, Rigidity, Controversy: The Three Deadly Sins in Modern Football Management

Football Blog

Volatility, Rigidity, Controversy: The Three Deadly Sins in Modern Football Management

Football management is a fragile profession, especially in the modern era.

All it takes is a mere run of a few poor results to turn a manager's position from safe and secure to unstable and precarious in the blink of an eye.

Interactions with the media and the words they speak are pivotal and can have irreversible consequences for their employment.

And sometimes, it is purely the rash and often harsh decision-making of the clubs which leads to the inequitable demise of the person in charge.

Perhaps nothing has been a better example of the effect each of those components can have than the past couple of weeks.

Movements in the manager market have been rife, with clubs making decisive decisions about those at the helm at a sprightly pace.

A plethora of those at the head of the footballing food chain have parted ways with their gaffers, leaving a chaotic trail of questions and debate in their wake.

But, arguably, the most damning realisation amongst all the frantic discourse isn't necessarily about the case studies themselves but more what it says about the state of football management – and a little concept I like to call 'the three deadly sins of modern football management'.


What Are The Three Deadly Sins?

Now, you're probably thinking that 'three deadly sins' is a bit of an extreme name for it, and maybe you're right.

But these are essentially the three factors I believe lead to the almost inevitable sacking of a manager in the professional game.

So, what are they?

Volatility

Volatility, in this case, refers to the football clubs themselves. We see it mostly when the expectation is high, but it is a phenomenon rising in prominence in the modern game.

Think of clubs like Watford; the turnover of managers is ridiculous and stems from the unpredictability and impatience of their owners.

Managers face an uphill battle from the moment they are put in a job, and if they don't hit the ground running, things can get ugly pretty quickly.


Rigidity

The idea around rigidity is pretty simple.

Managers who refuse to be tactically adaptable and shoehorn their side into their preferred system no matter how badly the team plays are, as you'd expect, leaving themselves open to a spot back in the unemployment line.

Russell Martin is a good example here. Brought Southampton up from the Championship playing a possession-based system with players who were better than their opposition nine times out of ten.

Then he proceeded to keep the same system in the Premier League with players who weren't better than their opposition and eventually got sacked with his side at the bottom of the league.


Controversy

The onus placed on media interaction and the scrutiny on every word can spell trouble for a manager when handled incorrectly.

This one most commonly stems from those who have a problem with the way the hierarchy is handling affairs or those who don't exactly represent the club well in the way they act when put in the spotlight.

When a manager is sacked, it is often intertwined with some form of controversy.


Now we've established what they are, let's dive a little deeper.

The Rise of Volatility

Football hasn't always been as volatile as it is today. In fact, in previous eras, it was accepted that some settling-in time was needed for a real impact to be made.

But in the modern day, everyone has an opinion, and it has become increasingly difficult to ignore outside noise for those in a club's hierarchy.

Now of course, outside opinion isn't what informs a club's decisions to make a managerial change, but murmurings of discontent among fans must have some effect – especially with the evasiveness of those comments in the age of social media.

Not only is it outside opinion that can inform volatility in a football club, but perhaps more importantly, it is the business-like nature of 21st-century football.

The need to succeed for the sake of revenue and making money means that the slightest hint of underperformance puts ownership on high alert and makes them ask serious questions of those leading the team.

The most explicit example of this in recent weeks was Wilfried Nancy at Celtic.

Appointed in December 2025, given merely eight games as manager before being sacked in favour of someone new.