Chelsea's Goalkeeper Decision: Why Passing On This Star Was A Huge Error
In the ever-unforgiving landscape of elite football, recruitment missteps can define seasons — and sometimes entire eras. Chelsea Football Club, once known for their ruthlessly efficient squad-building, may have made one of their costliest oversights in recent years. When the Blues passed on Mike Maignan as a potential successor between the sticks, they didn't just miss out on a good goalkeeper — they let a generational one slip through their fingers.
It’s no secret that Chelsea have been in search of a stable No.1 since the departure of Thibaut Courtois in 2018. Kepa Arrizabalaga, who arrived for a then-world-record fee, never lived up to the billing. Despite a recent loan spell at Real Madrid, his inconsistencies remain well-documented. Edouard Mendy briefly steadied the ship, even playing a pivotal role in Chelsea’s Champions League triumph in 2021, but the Senegalese international also found himself out of favour due to erratic form and distribution shortcomings.
By the summer of 2023, the need for a world-class, modern goalkeeper was evident. Chelsea opted to sign Robert Sánchez from Brighton and later Djordje Petrović from MLS. Solid options? Perhaps. But elite, title-winning calibre? The jury’s still out.
Meanwhile, across the Channel, Mike Maignan was fast becoming one of the best goalkeepers in world football.
Maignan’s rise has been nothing short of meteoric. After helping Lille clinch the Ligue 1 title in 2021, he replaced the legendary Gianluigi Donnarumma at AC Milan — a daunting task in itself. Not only did he fill the void, he excelled. In his first season at San Siro, Maignan was instrumental in Milan’s first Serie A title in over a decade, with his presence, shot-stopping, and distribution all drawing rave reviews.
In an era where goalkeepers are required to be more than just shot-stoppers, Maignan ticks every box. Commanding in the box, fearless under pressure, and boasting one of the best passing ranges of any keeper in Europe, his profile is tailor-made for the Premier League — and, crucially, for a club like Chelsea that demands playing out from the back.
2020/21: Mike Maignan keeps more Ligue 1 clean sheets than any goalkeeper as Lille win their first league title in 10 years 🇫🇷🏆
— Football on TNT Sports (@footballontnt) June 8, 2025
2021/22: Mike Maignan keeps more Serie A clean sheets than any goalkeeper as Milan win their first league title in 11 years 🇮🇹🏆 pic.twitter.com/gZxsVwRNqy
Maignan’s traits align with the blueprint of a modern Chelsea team. His quick distribution could have helped launch counter-attacks, while his vocal presence would have brought structure to a sometimes-fragile backline. As Chelsea looked to rebuild under new ownership, a leader between the posts could have accelerated the process.
What makes the missed opportunity all the more glaring is the timing. Maignan was reportedly available for a fee that now looks like a bargain compared to what top-tier keepers command. Unlike other options, he came with a winning pedigree and international experience with France.
When you compare the performances of Maignan and Sánchez across their most recent full seasons, the contrast becomes even clearer. Maignan, playing for AC Milan in Serie A, made around 3.6 saves per game across 10 appearances, conceding just 12 goals and maintaining a pass accuracy of 88.2%. Though he managed only one clean sheet in that stretch due to team circumstances and a smaller sample size, his distribution and command of the area were key features of his play.
By contrast, Robert Sánchez made 93 saves across 32 Premier League matches for Chelsea, averaging about three saves per game with a respectable save rate of 73.2%. He kept 10 clean sheets and conceded just under one goal per 90 minutes, suggesting a strong defensive record on paper.
However, the nuances tell a different story. Maignan attempted roughly 36 passes per game with nearly 85% completion, while also executing around six accurate long passes per match — comparable to the likes of Ederson and Alisson in terms of initiating attacks. Sánchez, though more accurate in short passing with an 87.7% overall accuracy, showed a slightly lower success rate in long-ball completion, hovering around 55%.
Across the season, Maignan accumulated 82 saves and 13 clean sheets compared to Sánchez’s 89 saves and 10 clean sheets. When looking at advanced metrics such as post-shot expected goals minus goals allowed (a measure of how many goals a keeper ‘prevents’ beyond the expected), Maignan posted a significantly higher overperformance. His figure was roughly -27.6 compared to Sánchez’s -17.5, indicating that Maignan made more high-impact saves.
Ultimately, both keepers are capable shot-stoppers, but Maignan edges the comparison when it comes to distribution, long-range passing, and high-level consistency. His ability to play as a sweeper-keeper and contribute to build-up play could have made him an ideal modern solution for Chelsea’s evolving style.
Instead, Chelsea now find themselves in a goalkeeper limbo — juggling average options, none of whom have truly convinced. Petrović has shown flashes of quality, but he’s still unproven on the biggest stages. Sánchez has struggled with consistency and ball-playing, two of the very weaknesses that the club aimed to rectify.
In contrast, Maignan has gone from strength to strength. Now firmly France’s No.1 ahead of the Euros, and one of the most coveted stoppers in Europe, the window to sign him may already be shut — unless Chelsea are willing to part with an enormous sum. The club’s failure to act when they had the chance is a decision that could haunt them for years.
🚨🔴⚫️ AC Milan director Tare: “Mike Maignan will stay with us next season”.
— Fabrizio Romano (@FabrizioRomano) June 24, 2025
“There was interest from a Premier League club [Chelsea] but we didn’t find an agreement. We decided to keep Mike”.
“You never know what happens on the market… but we want Maignan to stay”. pic.twitter.com/Acw9k1pJLs
This isn't just about one player — it’s indicative of a broader pattern. Chelsea’s scattergun recruitment since Todd Boehly’s arrival has seen billions spent with little strategic cohesion. Instead of pinpointing proven talents like Maignan, the club has often opted for younger, riskier prospects or players without the pedigree to instantly elevate the team.
The Maignan situation is an example of what can happen when scouting is reactive rather than proactive.
Chelsea have spent £945.6m under Todd Boehly in just over 12 months 😲🤑 pic.twitter.com/v9FbPnsJL6
— Sky Sports Premier League (@SkySportsPL) August 18, 2023
Hindsight is 20/20 in football, but certain decisions are glaring even in the moment. Chelsea’s failure to pursue Mike Maignan when the opportunity was ripe wasn’t just a small oversight — it was a major error that may have set their rebuild back significantly. While Maignan continues to shine on Europe’s biggest stages, Chelsea are still searching for a true No.1. The mistake? They already had the answer in front of them — and they let him pass them by.
Join our newsletter
Become a part of our community and never miss an update from Football Park.
Contact Sales