
The Premier League is hurtling towards the business end of the season, and with that welcomes the return of midweek fixtures. Last night saw four chaotic matches take place, and while most of them went by the script, the ever-controversial VAR had a say in two games last night.
Both Leeds and Bournemouth found themselves on the wrong side of VAR last night. Let's look at the games, and pinpoint the exact moments where VAR caused the outcome of the games to potentially change.
Leeds lost at home to Sunderland last night, and it'd be fair to say they were hard done by.
In somewhat of a lacklustre game, the scores were tied until the 70th minute, when Sunderland were awarded a penalty. Habib Diarra slotted home from the spot for The Black Cats, resulting in the game ending in a loss for The Whites.
However, the penalty call was extremely questionable. Following a blocked Wilson Isidor shot by Leeds captain Ethan Ampadu, referee Stuart Attwell was advised to look at the pitchside monitor.
"It's difficult to explain how it's a penalty" 😤
— Sky Sports News (@SkySportsNews) March 4, 2026
Daniel Farke and Regis Le Bris react to Sunderland's 1-0 win against Leeds, where a controversial penalty decision decided the game at Elland Road 💬 pic.twitter.com/ReNucxkpzP
After minutes of uncertainty, a penalty was eventually awarded for a handball by Ampadu inside the area. The decision sent both the Leeds players and supporters into a frenzy of frustration, and understandably so.
Should the remaining midweek fixtures go against them, Leeds could find themselves just three points above the drop zone. It is yet another example of how VAR, rather than clarifying the game, can leave it feeling more contentious than ever.
After a 0-0 draw against Brentford last night, Bournemouth manager Andoni Iraola was left lost for words, admitting that the decision to not award his side a penalty is a decision that he "cannot accept".
Bournemouth boss Andoni Iraola can't believe his side didn't get a penalty for a challenge on Marcus Tavernier in the 0-0 draw with Brentford.#BBCFootball pic.twitter.com/HupQnv3TuN
— Match of the Day (@BBCMOTD) March 3, 2026
Despite extending their run to nine games unbeaten in the Premier League, the Cherries missed an array of chances in front of goal throughout the game, yet Iraola believes midfielder Marcus Tavernier was fouled inside the penalty area.
Should this have been a penalty to Bournemouth?
— Football on TNT Sports (@footballontnt) March 3, 2026
Robbie Savage certainly thinks so... but VAR doesn't agree 🎥
📺 @tntsports & @discoveryplusUK pic.twitter.com/5i0vxpUGXo
Early on in the second half, Tavernier was brought down in the box by Brentford's Michael Kayode, although referee Craig Pawson was not interested in the alleged challenge. Subsequently, the game ended in a stalemate.
Last night exposed VAR in two starkly different lights, the system intervening too readily, and the system failing to intervene when it should.
Good thing about Var is it’ll clear up any issues. I’m sure we can all agree here which 3 offences are CLEARLY holding offences (you know, 2 hands clasped together around someone) and which one is a hand on a shoulder (no grab, no pull, no push). Glad VAR/ref agreed 👍 pic.twitter.com/hjTBzUrLJ7
— David Coyle (@DavidCo15594164) March 4, 2026
Since its introduction in the 2019/20 season, VAR has repeatedly demonstrated both its capacity to improve decision-making and its ability to generate controversy. Marginal calls can reshape entire campaigns, with a single review determining dropped points, suspensions, or disallowed goals.
While the case for VAR’s role in modern football is substantial, the argument for its removal is increasingly difficult to ignore.
However, what is certain is that the system cannot continue in its current form. Reform is essential, or the Premier League will face mounting backlash.
Join our newsletter
Become a part of our community and never miss an update from Football Park.
Contact Sales